Skip to content
Nordic Network UK

The Venezuelan Crisis Is Poised to Shape Trump's Legacy - as well as the United States' Position in the Global Order

Following executing a night of overwhelming force in Venezuela, Donald Trump now appears to be entering the state-building business.

In a remarkable press conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate on Saturday morning, the president stated that US forces had effectively apprehended Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then announced that a team featuring Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, working with Venezuelans, would be taking control of the embattled nation.

"We are going to manage the country until such time as we can do a secure, orderly and judicious transition," he said.

What exactly "running the country" actually means is unclear, but the vow marks an dramatic policy reversal for the president, laden with contradictions and significant obstacles.

A president who campaigned against "forever wars", who sharply criticised past US attempts at overthrowing governments and who vowed to implement an "America First" foreign policy is now betting his presidency on successfully reconstructing a South American nation whose economy is collapsed and whose political stability has been undermined by years of dictatorship.

Yet, Trump was persistently confident.

He stated his administration has a "unblemished record of winning" – and that this would be no exception. He promised to recruit American oil firms to repair Venezuela's crumbling production infrastructure, providing capital for the American reconstruction efforts and aiding the Venezuelan people.

He left open the possibility of sending American soldiers to Venezuela to progress these efforts. "We do not fear boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a vocal opponent of the US invasion of Iraq, will now have to consider the words of one of the American planners of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "You break it, you bought it."

A Changed Global Approach

The US has altered Venezuela's future – for better or worse.

Trump took office nearly a year ago pledging to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has proven that he is ready to use military force around the globe.

In the past week, he authorized airstrikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he struck atomic sites in Iran, alleged narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, rebel forces in Yemen, armed groups in Somalia and Islamic militants in Iraq.

In contrast to previous actions, which have mostly involved missiles and warplanes that minimize the risk of American forces to danger, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his commitments to the future of that nation – are strikingly different.

His goal, he said during his press conference, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Response at Home and Abroad

That play on Trump's "MAGA" – or Maga - mantra could be hard for some of Trump's backers to digest.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump loyalist who split from the president after charging him of abandoning his core supporters, was swift to condemn the president's actions on social media.

"Public outrage with our own government's never ending use of force and backing for overseas conflicts is understandable because we are forced to fund it," she wrote. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. How mistaken we were."

Another prominent Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, contrasted the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on weapons and cocaine trafficking charges – with Trump's explanation that the operation was to reclaim confiscated US oil and stop fentanyl production.

The majority of Republican lawmakers supported the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the military action against a "illegitimate government" as "firm and warranted".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his press conference, the president said the Venezuelan operation furthered his "America First" agenda because it guaranteed US regional security and provided a reliable source of oil.

He dusted off the Monroe Doctrine – an nineteenth-century American diplomatic policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be free from influence by European powers – and rebranded it the "Donroe Doctrine."

The action in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "US preeminence in the Western Hemisphere will never be challenged again."

The purpose of the new US security policy, he said, was to "safeguard trade, territory and resources that are fundamental to our security interests." He labeled the Western Hemisphere as America's "backyard."

Trump's decision to apprehend Maduro will provoke broader questions in global politics, however, and affect American relations with the world's other major military powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry released a statement expressing shock and denouncing what it said was a irresponsible attack on a sovereign nation.

During the Biden administration, the US offered similar condemnations of Russia following its incursion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is attempting to mediate a peace deal between those two nations – one that has often appeared to be more favourable to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a centrist Republican congressman, expressed concern about the message Trump's actions might send.

"My primary worry is now Russia will use this to justify their unlawful and barbaric military actions against Ukraine, or China to rationalize an invasion of Taiwan."

Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Trump's Democratic critics were sharper.

"America should not be administering other countries for any purpose," said a senator who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee. "We should have learned by now not to get entangled in endless wars and regime change missions that carry catastrophic consequences for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a criminal and a dictator with a record of human rights abuses. But he condemned Trump's choice not to consult with congressional leaders before initiating the attack.

"Donald Trump has the legal duty to follow the law and uphold democratic norms in the United States," he said. "That is what placing America First demands."

Trump, in his remarks, explained that he opted not to inform Congress because he was concerned they would "disclose" details of the operation prior to the attack.

An Uncertain Future

That military operation was a success – with no American deaths and minimal damage to US equipment. Trump, with his typical bravado, portrayed the operation as a "spectacular assault" and "among the most astonishing, effective and powerful demonstrations of American military might and proficiency in US history."

Now he is staking his legacy on that success continuing, as the US says it will assume responsibility for running and rebuilding Venezuela - though what that truly entails remains unknown. He and his team must rebuild a nation that has been in turmoil for decades while stabilising a region that is sure to be apprehensive of what Trump's international strategy has planned for them.

PC
The writer

Pamela Costa

A sustainability consultant specializing in Nordic business models, with over a decade of experience in cross-border trade and environmental policy.

Nordic Network UK

Type to search articles.